You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Patients’ and professionals’ views related to ethical issues in precision medicine: a mixed research synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, August 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12910-021-00682-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anke Erdmann, Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Claudia Bozzaro |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| Austria | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 156 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 11 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 77 | 49% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 82 | 53% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,463,317
of 24,833,726 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#252
of 1,077 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,477
of 422,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#10
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,833,726 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,077 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.