You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Arming the oncolytic virus enadenotucirev (EnAd) to generate enhanced locally-acting immunotherapies for cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer, November 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/2051-1426-3-s2-p334 |
Authors |
Brian R Champion, Nalini Rasiah, Sam Illingworth, Hugo Calderon, Matthieu Besneux, Rochelle Lear, Darren Plumb, Prithvi Kodialbail, Alice Brown |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,535,684
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#2,057
of 3,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#102,287
of 296,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal for Immunotherapy of Cancer
#38
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,421 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,796 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.