↓ Skip to main content

Achieving inclusive research priority-setting: what do people with lived experience and the public think is essential?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Achieving inclusive research priority-setting: what do people with lived experience and the public think is essential?
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, September 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12910-021-00685-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bridget Pratt

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Other 2 7%
Unspecified 2 7%
Lecturer 2 7%
Researcher 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 14 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 10%
Unspecified 2 7%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 4 14%
Unknown 15 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2021.
All research outputs
#18,145,205
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#894
of 1,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,665
of 429,355 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#35
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,011 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,355 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.