You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Online-synchronized clinical simulation: an efficient teaching-learning option for the COVID-19 pandemic time and: beyond
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-021-00183-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Diego Andrés Díaz-Guio, Elena Ríos-Barrientos, Pablo Andrés Santillán-Roldan, Santiago Mora-Martinez, Ana Sofía Díaz-Gómez, Joel Alejandro Martínez-Elizondo, Adrián Barrientos-Aguiñaga, Maria Nathalie Arroyo-Romero, Alejandra Ricardo-Zapata, Alfonso J. Rodríguez-Morales |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 4 | 15% |
| Spain | 3 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| Peru | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 81% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 71 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Lecturer | 7 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 10% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 14 | 20% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 13% |
| Psychology | 2 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 24 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2021.
All research outputs
#1,614,748
of 24,932,492 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#66
of 262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,050
of 422,834 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,492 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,834 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.