You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A protocol for a systematic literature review of economic evaluation studies of interventions to address antimicrobial resistance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01794-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aparna Ananthakrishnan, Chris Painter, Yot Teerawattananon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Thailand | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 50% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 49 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 30 | 61% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 30 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,011,922
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#562
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,866
of 429,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#20
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.