Title |
Aspects of functioning and environmental factors in medical work capacity evaluations of persons with chronic widespread pain and low back pain can be represented by a combination of applicable ICF Core Sets
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1088 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Urban Schwegler, Jessica Anner, Christine Boldt, Andrea Glässel, Veronika Lay, Wout Ernst Lodewijk De Boer, Gerold Stucki, Bruno Trezzini |
Abstract |
Medical work capacity evaluations play a key role in social security schemes because they usually form the basis for eligibility decisions regarding disability benefits. However, the evaluations are often poorly standardized and lack transparency as decisions on work capacity are based on a claimant's disease rather than on his or her functional capacity. A comprehensive and consistent illustration of a claimant's lived experience in relation to functioning, applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the ICF Core Sets (ICF-CS), potentially enhances transparency and standardization of work capacity evaluations. In our study we wanted to establish whether and how the relevant content of work capacity evaluations can be captured by ICF-CS, using disability claimants with chronic widespread pain (CWP) and low back pain (LBP) as examples. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Germany | 1 | 14% |
Canada | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Korea, Republic of | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 60 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 20% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 18% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 7% |
Other | 13 | 21% |
Unknown | 9 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 20% |
Psychology | 10 | 16% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 5% |
Other | 17 | 28% |
Unknown | 9 | 15% |