↓ Skip to main content

AID/APOBEC cytosine deaminase induces genome-wide kataegis

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#50 of 493)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
92 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AID/APOBEC cytosine deaminase induces genome-wide kataegis
Published in
Biology Direct, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-7-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Artem G Lada, Alok Dhar, Robert J Boissy, Masayuki Hirano, Aleksandr A Rubel, Igor B Rogozin, Youri I Pavlov

Abstract

Clusters of localized hypermutation in human breast cancer genomes, named "kataegis" (from the Greek for thunderstorm), are hypothesized to result from multiple cytosine deaminations catalyzed by AID/APOBEC proteins. However, a direct link between APOBECs and kataegis is still lacking. We have sequenced the genomes of yeast mutants induced in diploids by expression of the gene for PmCDA1, a hypermutagenic deaminase from sea lamprey. Analysis of the distribution of 5,138 induced mutations revealed localized clusters very similar to those found in tumors. Our data provide evidence that unleashed cytosine deaminase activity is an evolutionary conserved, prominent source of genome-wide kataegis events.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 2%
Uruguay 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 86 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 27%
Researcher 23 25%
Student > Bachelor 9 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Student > Master 5 5%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 17 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 10%
Mathematics 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 19 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,507,054
of 23,332,901 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#50
of 493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,286
of 283,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#3
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,332,901 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.