↓ Skip to main content

Info-gap management of public health Policy for TB with HIV-prevalence and epidemiological uncertainty

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Info-gap management of public health Policy for TB with HIV-prevalence and epidemiological uncertainty
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1091
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yakov Ben-Haim, Clifford C Dacso, Nicola M Zetola

Abstract

Formulation and evaluation of public health policy commonly employs science-based mathematical models. For instance, epidemiological dynamics of TB is dominated, in general, by flow between actively and latently infected populations. Thus modelling is central in planning public health intervention. However, models are highly uncertain because they are based on observations that are geographically and temporally distinct from the population to which they are applied.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 2%
Switzerland 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 60 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 18%
Student > Master 8 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 6%
Other 11 17%
Unknown 20 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 29%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Mathematics 2 3%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 23 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2013.
All research outputs
#15,160,034
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#11,143
of 15,204 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,348
of 283,263 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#211
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,204 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 283,263 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.