↓ Skip to main content

Systemic-to-pulmonary collateral flow in patients with palliated univentricular heart physiology: measurement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance 4D velocity acquisition

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Systemic-to-pulmonary collateral flow in patients with palliated univentricular heart physiology: measurement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance 4D velocity acquisition
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, April 2012
DOI 10.1186/1532-429x-14-25
Pubmed ID
Authors

Israel Valverde, Sarah Nordmeyer, Sergio Uribe, Gerald Greil, Felix Berger, Titus Kuehne, Philipp Beerbaum

Abstract

Systemic-to-pulmonary collateral flow (SPCF) may constitute a risk factor for increased morbidity and mortality in patients with single-ventricle physiology (SV). However, clinical research is limited by the complexity of multi-vessel two-dimensional (2D) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) flow measurements. We sought to validate four-dimensional (4D) velocity acquisition sequence for concise quantification of SPCF and flow distribution in patients with SV.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Unknown 93 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 23 23%
Student > Master 12 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 8 8%
Other 23 23%
Unknown 15 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 51%
Engineering 16 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Computer Science 2 2%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 20 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2012.
All research outputs
#22,889,200
of 25,522,520 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,287
of 1,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,083
of 175,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,522,520 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.