You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review: Do patient expectations influence treatment outcomes in total knee and total hip arthroplasty?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-7525-10-152 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tsjitske M Haanstra, Tobias van den Berg, Raymond W Ostelo, Rudolf W Poolman, Ilse P Jansma, Pim Cuijpers, Henrica CW de Vet |
| Abstract |
This systematic review aims to summarise all the available evidence related to the association between pre-operative patient expectations (outcome expectations, process expectations and self efficacy expectations) and 5 different treatment outcomes (overall improvement, pain, function, stiffness and satisfaction) in patients with total knee or total hip arthroplasty at three different follow-op periods (>6 weeks; >6 weeks- ≤6 months; >6 months). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 209 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 206 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 14% |
| Researcher | 26 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Other | 52 | 25% |
| Unknown | 27 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 14% |
| Psychology | 23 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 37 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2013.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#1,449
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,423
of 288,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#16
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.