↓ Skip to main content

Clean birth kits to improve birth practices: development and testing of a country level decision support tool

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clean birth kits to improve birth practices: development and testing of a country level decision support tool
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-12-158
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vanora A Hundley, Bilal I Avan, Haris Ahmed, Wendy J Graham, for the Birth Kit Working Group

Abstract

Clean birth practices can prevent sepsis, one of the leading causes of both maternal and newborn mortality. Evidence suggests that clean birth kits (CBKs), as part of package that includes education, are associated with a reduction in newborn mortality, omphalitis, and puerperal sepsis. However, questions remain about how best to approach the introduction of CBKs in country. We set out to develop a practical decision support tool for programme managers of public health systems who are considering the potential role of CBKs in their strategy for care at birth.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 57 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Researcher 7 12%
Student > Master 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 5 8%
Other 15 25%
Unknown 12 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 12%
Social Sciences 5 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 5%
Environmental Science 2 3%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 12 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 January 2013.
All research outputs
#5,921,910
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,508
of 4,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,201
of 285,652 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#31
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,379 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,652 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.