You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
“Who writes what?” Using written comments in team-based assessment to better understand medical student performance: a mixed-methods study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-12-123 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jonathan Samuel White, Nishan Sharma |
Abstract |
Observation of the performance of medical students in the clinical environment is a key part of assessment and learning. To date, few authors have examined written comments provided to students and considered what aspects of observed performance they represent. The aim of this study was to examine the quantity and quality of written comments provided to medical students by different assessors using a team-based model of assessment, and to determine the aspects of medical student performance on which different assessors provide comments. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Turkey | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
United States | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 58 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 9 | 14% |
Researcher | 8 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 10% |
Lecturer | 5 | 8% |
Other | 22 | 35% |
Unknown | 6 | 10% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 32 | 51% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 10% |
Arts and Humanities | 3 | 5% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 7 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2015.
All research outputs
#13,661,887
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#1,695
of 3,503 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,105
of 284,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#18
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,503 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.