You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing the usability of wearable devices to measure gait and physical activity in chronic conditions: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12984-021-00931-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alison Keogh, Rob Argent, Amy Anderson, Brian Caulfield, William Johnston |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 5 | 22% |
| Spain | 3 | 13% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 4% |
| Japan | 1 | 4% |
| Czechia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 7 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 78% |
| Scientists | 3 | 13% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 128 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 128 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 16% |
| Unknown | 52 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
| Engineering | 10 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 10 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 14% |
| Unknown | 56 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,577,705
of 23,321,213 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#56
of 1,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,925
of 429,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,321,213 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,304 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.