↓ Skip to main content

Role of condom negotiation on condom use among women of reproductive age in three districts in Tanzania

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
189 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of condom negotiation on condom use among women of reproductive age in three districts in Tanzania
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1097
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amon Exavery, Almamy M Kanté, Elizabeth Jackson, John Noronha, Gloria Sikustahili, Kassimu Tani, Hildegalda P Mushi, Colin Baynes, Kate Ramsey, Ahmed Hingora, James F Phillips

Abstract

HIV/AIDS remains being a disease of great public health concern worldwide. In regions such as sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) where women are disproportionately infected with HIV, women are reportedly less likely capable of negotiating condom use. However, while knowledge of condom use for HIV prevention is extensive among men and women in many countries including Tanzania, evidence is limited about the role of condom negotiation on condom use among women in rural Tanzania.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Nigeria 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
Unknown 185 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 46 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 15%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 6%
Other 29 15%
Unknown 35 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 44 23%
Social Sciences 43 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 11%
Psychology 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 46 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2013.
All research outputs
#14,638,545
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,446
of 15,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,245
of 285,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#179
of 285 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,466 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 285 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.