You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Developing new ways to listen: the value of narrative approaches in empirical (bio)ethics
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12910-021-00691-7 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Bernadette Roest, Megan Milota, Carlo Leget |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 4 | 11% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 17 | 49% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 4 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 17 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,142,437
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#676
of 1,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#145,756
of 392,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#22
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,051 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 392,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.