You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Open source 3D phenotyping of chickpea plant architecture across plant development
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Plant Methods, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13007-021-00795-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
William T. Salter, Arjina Shrestha, Margaret M. Barbour |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 4 | 17% |
| Australia | 4 | 17% |
| India | 1 | 4% |
| Mexico | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 54% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 50% |
| Scientists | 8 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 24 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 16 | 67% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#2,480,660
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Plant Methods
#113
of 1,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,494
of 422,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plant Methods
#2
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,281 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.