You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early versus late awake prone positioning in non-intubated patients with COVID-19
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03761-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ramandeep Kaur, David L. Vines, Sara Mirza, Ahmad Elshafei, Julie A. Jackson, Lauren J. Harnois, Tyler Weiss, J. Brady Scott, Matthew W. Trump, Idrees Mogri, Flor Cerda, Amnah A. Alolaiwat, Amanda R. Miller, Andrew M. Klein, Trevor W. Oetting, Lindsey Morris, Scott Heckart, Lindsay Capouch, Hangyong He, Jie Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 163 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 17 | 10% |
| Mexico | 16 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 6% |
| Chile | 5 | 3% |
| Germany | 5 | 3% |
| Colombia | 4 | 2% |
| Italy | 3 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 20 | 12% |
| Unknown | 78 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 123 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 19 | 12% |
| Scientists | 16 | 10% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 131 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Researcher | 6 | 5% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 12% |
| Unknown | 75 | 57% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 22% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Unknown | 76 | 58% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 112. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2021.
All research outputs
#377,780
of 25,503,365 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#201
of 6,577 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,505
of 436,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#7
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,503,365 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,577 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,454 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.