You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can computerized clinical decision support systems improve practitioners' diagnostic test ordering behavior? A decision-maker-researcher partnership systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-6-88 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pavel S Roshanov, John J You, Jasmine Dhaliwal, David Koff, Jean A Mackay, Lorraine Weise-Kelly, Tamara Navarro, Nancy L Wilczynski, R Brian Haynes, the CCDSS Systematic Review Team |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Canada | 3 | 1% |
| Norway | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 3 | 1% |
| Unknown | 216 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 44 | 19% |
| Researcher | 32 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 27 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 21 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 15 | 6% |
| Other | 60 | 26% |
| Unknown | 35 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 92 | 39% |
| Computer Science | 25 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 8% |
| Social Sciences | 15 | 6% |
| Engineering | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 27 | 12% |
| Unknown | 49 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,435,621
of 22,731,677 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,247
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,099
of 119,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#12
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,731,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,751 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.