You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Inequalities in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health in Vietnam: a retrospective study of survey data for 1997–2006
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-456 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Henrik Axelson, Ulf-G Gerdtham, Björn Ekman, Dinh Thi Phuong Hoa, Tobias Alfvén |
| Abstract |
Vietnam has achieved considerable success in economic development, poverty reduction, and health over a relatively short period of time. However, there is concern that inequalities in health outcomes and intervention coverage are widening. This study explores if inequalities in reproductive, maternal, newborn and child health and nutrition changed over time in Vietnam in 1997-2006, and if inequalities were different depending on the type of stratifying variable used to measure inequalities and on the type of outcome studied. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 211 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 205 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 16% |
| Researcher | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 18% |
| Unknown | 59 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 31 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 13% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 5% |
| Psychology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 63 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2017.
All research outputs
#6,099,982
of 23,505,064 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,777
of 7,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,341
of 282,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#38
of 124 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,505,064 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 124 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.