↓ Skip to main content

Challenge in pathologic diagnosis of Alport syndrome: evidence from correction of previous misdiagnosis

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Challenge in pathologic diagnosis of Alport syndrome: evidence from correction of previous misdiagnosis
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1750-1172-7-100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiao-dan Yao, Xin Chen, Gao-yuan Huang, Yan-ting Yu, Shu-tian Xu, Yang-lin Hu, Qing-wen Wang, Hui-ping Chen, Cai-hong Zeng, Da-xi Ji, Wei-xin Hu, Zheng Tang, Zhi-hong Liu

Abstract

Pathologic studies play an important role in evaluating patients with Alport syndrome besides genotyping. Difficulties still exist in diagnosing Alport syndrome (AS), and misdiagnosis is a not-so-rare event, even in adult patient evaluated with renal biopsy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 16%
Other 5 14%
Student > Master 4 11%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 7 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2013.
All research outputs
#17,673,866
of 22,689,790 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,994
of 2,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,754
of 280,032 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#77
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,689,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,598 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,032 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.