↓ Skip to main content

Clinical use of exhaled volatile organic compounds in pulmonary diseases: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Respiratory Research, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
16 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
327 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical use of exhaled volatile organic compounds in pulmonary diseases: a systematic review
Published in
Respiratory Research, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1465-9921-13-117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kim DG van de Kant, Linda JTM van der Sande, Quirijn Jöbsis, Onno CP van Schayck, Edward Dompeling

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 327 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Philippines 1 <1%
Unknown 319 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 59 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 18%
Student > Master 42 13%
Student > Bachelor 38 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 4%
Other 50 15%
Unknown 67 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 69 21%
Chemistry 33 10%
Engineering 31 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 6%
Other 71 22%
Unknown 74 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2018.
All research outputs
#3,173,132
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Respiratory Research
#375
of 3,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,429
of 295,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Respiratory Research
#3
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,107 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 295,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.