↓ Skip to main content

Criteria for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines in paediatrics and neonatology: a mixed-method study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Criteria for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines in paediatrics and neonatology: a mixed-method study
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, September 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12911-021-01628-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joanna Dagard, Nadia Mazille-Orfanos, Nawras Georgi, Intissar Dechicha, Guy Carrault, Patrick Pladys, Alain Beuchée

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 18 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 6%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 72%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 3 17%
Computer Science 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Unknown 13 72%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,392,150
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#936
of 2,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#178,880
of 432,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#19
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,024 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.