You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Image-guided selection of Gd@C-dots as sensitizers to improve radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, September 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12951-021-01018-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiaofen Ma, Chaebin Lee, Tao Zhang, Jinghua Cai, Hui Wang, Fangchao Jiang, Zhanhong Wu, Jin Xie, Guihua Jiang, Zibo Li |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 29% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 7% |
Professor | 1 | 7% |
Lecturer | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 5 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 3 | 21% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 14% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 7% |
Materials Science | 1 | 7% |
Chemistry | 1 | 7% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,996,444
of 23,381,576 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#252
of 1,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,338
of 433,505 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#21
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,381,576 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,502 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,505 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.