↓ Skip to main content

Hemoglobin A1c measurement for the diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes in children

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hemoglobin A1c measurement for the diagnosis of Type 2 diabetes in children
Published in
International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1687-9856-2012-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chirag Kapadia, Philip Zeitler, Drugs and Therapeutics Committee of the Pediatric Endocrine Society

Abstract

Laboratory measurements of hemoglobin A1c above 6.5% were approved as an additional diagnostic criteria for diabetes mellitus by the American Diabetes Association in 2010. Several recent pediatric studies have cast HbA1c measurement in children in an unfavorable light in the pediatric population, by comparing HbA1c measurements to results on oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) or fasting plasma glucose (FPG). However, many of these studies do not recognize that diabetes diagnostic criteria are based upon long-term health outcomes. In this sense, OGTT and FPG have themselves never been validated in the pediatric population. Studies to validate diagnostic tests for diabetes in pediatric populations may take a substantial period of time, and may prove unfeasible. However, studies that tie diagnostic results as a child to diagnostic results as an adult may be more feasible and may provide the data needed to determine which pediatric diagnostic criteria to use. Thus, for the time being, except for cases of hemoglobinopathy, cystic fibrosis, and a few other exceptions, describing HbA1c as 'lacking in sensitivity or specificity' in the pediatric population because of lack of correlation with OGTT is not scientifically sound.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 25%
Other 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Postgraduate 5 9%
Other 13 23%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 45%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 12 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 December 2012.
All research outputs
#22,778,604
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology
#128
of 137 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258,305
of 288,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Pediatric Endocrinology
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 137 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.