You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Study protocol for a type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation trial of strategies to implement firearm safety promotion as a universal suicide prevention strategy in pediatric primary care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-021-01154-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rinad S. Beidas, Brian K. Ahmedani, Kristin A. Linn, Steven C. Marcus, Christina Johnson, Melissa Maye, Joslyn Westphal, Leslie Wright, Arne L. Beck, Alison M. Buttenheim, Matthew F. Daley, Molly Davis, Marisa E. Elias, Shari Jager-Hyman, Katelin Hoskins, Adina Lieberman, Bridget McArdle, Debra P. Ritzwoller, Dylan S. Small, Courtney Benjamin Wolk, Nathaniel J. Williams, Jennifer M. Boggs |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 53% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 53% |
| Scientists | 14 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Researcher | 4 | 5% |
| Lecturer | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 41 | 51% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 11 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Psychology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 46 | 57% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,924,420
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#355
of 1,821 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,729
of 438,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,821 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.