You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Assessing research impact in academic clinical medicine: a study using Research Excellence Framework pilot impact indicators
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, December 2012
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-12-478 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Pavel V Ovseiko, Alis Oancea, Alastair M Buchan |
Abstract |
Funders of medical research the world over are increasingly seeking, in research assessment, to complement traditional output measures of scientific publications with more outcome-based indicators of societal and economic impact. In the United Kingdom, the Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) developed proposals for the Research Excellence Framework (REF) to allocate public research funding to higher education institutions, inter alia, on the basis of the social and economic impact of their research. In 2010, it conducted a pilot exercise to test these proposals and refine impact indicators and criteria. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 24 | 41% |
Canada | 8 | 14% |
United States | 4 | 7% |
Colombia | 1 | 2% |
Australia | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Spain | 1 | 2% |
Germany | 1 | 2% |
Hong Kong | 1 | 2% |
Other | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 16 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 30 | 51% |
Scientists | 19 | 32% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
Netherlands | 2 | 1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
Germany | 1 | <1% |
Iran, Islamic Republic of | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 155 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 25 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 14% |
Student > Master | 23 | 14% |
Other | 14 | 9% |
Librarian | 10 | 6% |
Other | 39 | 24% |
Unknown | 30 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 41 | 25% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 14% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 10 | 6% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 4% |
Other | 41 | 25% |
Unknown | 35 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 42. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,013,041
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#262
of 8,760 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,910
of 291,015 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#1
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,760 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,015 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.