You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Is there a role for Digital X-ray Radiogrammetry as surrogate marker for radiological progression and imaging of structural integrity in rheumatoid arthritis?
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, June 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12891-015-0577-3 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Alexander Pfeil, Peter Oelzner, Diane M. Renz, Andreas Hansch, Gunter Wolf, Joachim Böttcher |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 15% |
Other | 4 | 12% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
Other | 6 | 18% |
Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 38% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 9% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 9% |
Psychology | 3 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2021.
All research outputs
#2,197,010
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#443
of 4,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,003
of 265,006 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#4
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,006 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.