You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Pediatric hypophosphatasia: lessons learned from a retrospective single-center chart review of 50 children
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, August 2020
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13023-020-01500-x |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Marius Vogt, Hermann Girschick, Tilmann Schweitzer, Clemens Benoit, Annette Holl-Wieden, Lothar Seefried, Franz Jakob, Christine Hofmann |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 6 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 9% |
Student > Master | 4 | 9% |
Other | 7 | 16% |
Unknown | 16 | 36% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 31% |
Unspecified | 3 | 7% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 7% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 4% |
Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
Other | 6 | 13% |
Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 February 2022.
All research outputs
#7,602,582
of 23,179,757 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,121
of 2,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,992
of 400,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#19
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,179,757 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,656 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 400,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.