You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The impact of wearable continuous vital sign monitoring on deterioration detection and clinical outcomes in hospitalised patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-021-03766-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carlos Areia, Christopher Biggs, Mauro Santos, Neal Thurley, Stephen Gerry, Lionel Tarassenko, Peter Watkinson, Sarah Vollam |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 53 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 20 | 38% |
| Spain | 6 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 4% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 2% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 6% |
| Unknown | 16 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 26% |
| Scientists | 12 | 23% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 95 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 16% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 32 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 26% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 35 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2023.
All research outputs
#1,089,131
of 25,605,018 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#863
of 6,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,408
of 436,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#23
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,605,018 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,604 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.