You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reproducibility of in-vivo diffusion tensor cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-14-86 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura-Ann McGill, Tevfik F Ismail, Sonia Nielles-Vallespin, Pedro Ferreira, Andrew D Scott, Michael Roughton, Philip J Kilner, S Yen Ho, Karen P McCarthy, Peter D Gatehouse, Ranil de Silva, Peter Speier, Thorsten Feiweier, Choukkri Mekkaoui, David E Sosnovik, Sanjay K Prasad, David N Firmin, Dudley J Pennell |
| Abstract |
Myocardial disarray is an important histological feature of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) which has been studied post-mortem, but its in-vivo prevalence and extent is unknown. Cardiac Diffusion Tensor Imaging (cDTI) provides information on mean intravoxel myocyte orientation and potentially myocardial disarray. Recent technical advances have improved in-vivo cDTI, and the aim of this study was to assess the interstudy reproducibility of quantitative in-vivo cDTI in patients with HCM. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 129 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 122 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 26% |
| Researcher | 30 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 8% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 16% |
| Unknown | 18 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 41 | 32% |
| Engineering | 31 | 24% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 10 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 7% |
| Unknown | 25 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2013.
All research outputs
#23,084,818
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,293
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,687
of 290,990 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#27
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 290,990 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.