↓ Skip to main content

Experimental evidence for opposing effects of high deer density on tick-borne pathogen prevalence and hazard

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Experimental evidence for opposing effects of high deer density on tick-borne pathogen prevalence and hazard
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, September 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13071-021-05000-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Gandy, Elizabeth Kilbride, Roman Biek, Caroline Millins, Lucy Gilbert

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 24 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 24%
Environmental Science 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 25 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,671,466
of 25,301,208 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#518
of 5,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,369
of 428,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#15
of 151 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,301,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 151 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.