↓ Skip to main content

A laminar augmented cascading flexible neural forest model for classification of cancer subtypes based on gene expression data

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A laminar augmented cascading flexible neural forest model for classification of cancer subtypes based on gene expression data
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12859-021-04391-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lianxin Zhong, Qingfang Meng, Yuehui Chen, Lei Du, Peng Wu

Abstract

Correctly classifying the subtypes of cancer is of great significance for the in-depth study of cancer pathogenesis and the realization of personalized treatment for cancer patients. In recent years, classification of cancer subtypes using deep neural networks and gene expression data has gradually become a research hotspot. However, most classifiers may face overfitting and low classification accuracy when dealing with small sample size and high-dimensional biology data. In this paper, a laminar augmented cascading flexible neural forest (LACFNForest) model was proposed to complete the classification of cancer subtypes. This model is a cascading flexible neural forest using deep flexible neural forest (DFNForest) as the base classifier. A hierarchical broadening ensemble method was proposed, which ensures the robustness of classification results and avoids the waste of model structure and function as much as possible. We also introduced an output judgment mechanism to each layer of the forest to reduce the computational complexity of the model. The deep neural forest was extended to the densely connected deep neural forest to improve the prediction results. The experiments on RNA-seq gene expression data showed that LACFNForest has better performance in the classification of cancer subtypes compared to the conventional methods. The LACFNForest model effectively improves the accuracy of cancer subtype classification with good robustness. It provides a new approach for the ensemble learning of classifiers in terms of structural design.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 38%
Unspecified 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 13%
Computer Science 1 13%
Sports and Recreations 1 13%
Other 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,749,545
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#4,294
of 7,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#190,240
of 433,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#109
of 163 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,382 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 163 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.