↓ Skip to main content

Developing European guidelines for training care professionals in mental health promotion

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developing European guidelines for training care professionals in mental health promotion
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tim Greacen, Emmanuelle Jouet, Peter Ryan, Zoltan Cserhati, Vera Grebenc, Chris Griffiths, Bettina Hansen, Eithne Leahy, Ksenija Maravic da Silva, Amra Šabić, Angela De Marco, Paz Flores

Abstract

Although mental health promotion is a priority mental health action area for all European countries, high level training resources and high quality skills acquisition in mental health promotion are still relatively rare. The aim of the current paper is to present the results of the DG SANCO-funded PROMISE project concerning the development of European guidelines for training social and health care professionals in mental health promotion.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 83 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 18%
Student > Master 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Researcher 4 5%
Other 14 17%
Unknown 28 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 14 17%
Social Sciences 11 13%
Psychology 9 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 28 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 December 2012.
All research outputs
#13,879,693
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#9,985
of 14,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#164,385
of 280,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#192
of 294 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,764 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 294 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.