↓ Skip to main content

Perceived coping

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceived coping & concern predict terrorism preparedness in Australia
Published in
BMC Public Health, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1117
Pubmed ID
Authors

Garry Stevens, Kingsley Agho, Melanie Taylor, Alison L Jones, Margo Barr, Beverley Raphael

Abstract

In the aftermath of major terrorist incidents research shows population shifts towards protective behaviours, including specific preparedness and avoidance responses. Less is known about individual preparedness in populations with high assumed threat but limited direct exposure, such as Australia. In this study we aimed to determine whether individuals with high perceived coping and higher concern would show greater preparedness to respond to terrorism threats.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 <1%
Unknown 163 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 31 19%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 6%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 52 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 45 27%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 7%
Psychology 10 6%
Computer Science 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 4%
Other 21 13%
Unknown 62 38%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2012.
All research outputs
#14,349,510
of 21,342,999 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#10,591
of 13,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,645
of 292,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#804
of 1,043 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,342,999 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,043 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.