↓ Skip to main content

A framework for validating AI in precision medicine: considerations from the European ITFoC consortium

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
122 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A framework for validating AI in precision medicine: considerations from the European ITFoC consortium
Published in
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12911-021-01634-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosy Tsopra, Xose Fernandez, Claudio Luchinat, Lilia Alberghina, Hans Lehrach, Marco Vanoni, Felix Dreher, O.Ugur Sezerman, Marc Cuggia, Marie de Tayrac, Edvins Miklasevics, Lucian Mihai Itu, Marius Geanta, Lesley Ogilvie, Florence Godey, Cristian Nicolae Boldisor, Boris Campillo-Gimenez, Cosmina Cioroboiu, Costin Florian Ciusdel, Simona Coman, Oliver Hijano Cubelos, Alina Itu, Bodo Lange, Matthieu Le Gallo, Alexandra Lespagnol, Giancarlo Mauri, H.Okan Soykam, Bastien Rance, Paola Turano, Leonardo Tenori, Alessia Vignoli, Christoph Wierling, Nora Benhabiles, Anita Burgun

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) has the potential to transform our healthcare systems significantly. New AI technologies based on machine learning approaches should play a key role in clinical decision-making in the future. However, their implementation in health care settings remains limited, mostly due to a lack of robust validation procedures. There is a need to develop reliable assessment frameworks for the clinical validation of AI. We present here an approach for assessing AI for predicting treatment response in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), using real-world data and molecular -omics data from clinical data warehouses and biobanks. The European "ITFoC (Information Technology for the Future Of Cancer)" consortium designed a framework for the clinical validation of AI technologies for predicting treatment response in oncology. This framework is based on seven key steps specifying: (1) the intended use of AI, (2) the target population, (3) the timing of AI evaluation, (4) the datasets used for evaluation, (5) the procedures used for ensuring data safety (including data quality, privacy and security), (6) the metrics used for measuring performance, and (7) the procedures used to ensure that the AI is explainable. This framework forms the basis of a validation platform that we are building for the "ITFoC Challenge". This community-wide competition will make it possible to assess and compare AI algorithms for predicting the response to TNBC treatments with external real-world datasets. The predictive performance and safety of AI technologies must be assessed in a robust, unbiased and transparent manner before their implementation in healthcare settings. We believe that the consideration of the ITFoC consortium will contribute to the safe transfer and implementation of AI in clinical settings, in the context of precision oncology and personalized care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 122 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 8%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Unspecified 8 7%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 59 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 7%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Computer Science 7 6%
Unspecified 7 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 4%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 67 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2021.
All research outputs
#5,615,058
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#471
of 2,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#109,588
of 433,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#12
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,024 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.