You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Isoniazid-induced gynaecomastia: report of a paediatric case and review of literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Endocrine Disorders, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12902-020-00639-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Wing Yiu Poon, Ka Ka Siu, Anita Man Ching Tsang |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 7 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 14% |
| Other | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 1 | 14% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#248
of 786 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,035
of 420,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Endocrine Disorders
#10
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 786 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.