You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of continuous glucose monitoring during diabetic pregnancy (GlucoMOMS trial); a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-12-164 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daphne N Voormolen, J Hans DeVries, Arie Franx, Ben WJ Mol, Inge M Evers |
| Abstract |
Hyperglycemia in pregnancy is associated with poor perinatal outcome. Even if pregnant women with diabetes are monitored according to current guidelines, they do much worse than their normoglycaemic counterparts, marked by increased risks of pre-eclampsia, macrosomia, and caesarean section amongst others. Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) is a new method providing detailed information on daily fluctuations, used to optimize glucose control. Whether this tool improves pregnancy outcome remains unclear. In the present protocol, we aim to assess the effect of CGM use in diabetic pregnancies on pregnancy outcome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 185 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 15% |
| Researcher | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 27 | 14% |
| Unknown | 63 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 36% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 9% |
| Psychology | 10 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 64 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2013.
All research outputs
#14,159,409
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#2,688
of 4,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,511
of 280,466 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#63
of 77 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,155 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,466 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 77 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.