You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Diabetic angiopathy and angiogenic defects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair, August 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1755-1536-5-13 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ling Xu, Keizo Kanasaki, Munehiro Kitada, Daisuke Koya |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Slovakia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 22 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 26% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 24 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2023.
All research outputs
#3,660,693
of 24,727,020 outputs
Outputs from Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair
#12
of 83 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,826
of 168,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fibrogenesis & Tissue Repair
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,727,020 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 168,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.