↓ Skip to main content

Comparative analysis of septic injury-inducible genes in phylogenetically distant model organisms of regeneration and stem cell research, the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea and the cnidarian Hydra…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Zoology, April 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative analysis of septic injury-inducible genes in phylogenetically distant model organisms of regeneration and stem cell research, the planarian Schmidtea mediterranea and the cnidarian Hydra vulgaris
Published in
Frontiers in Zoology, April 2008
DOI 10.1186/1742-9994-5-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Boran Altincicek, Andreas Vilcinskas

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 92 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 34%
Researcher 15 15%
Student > Master 10 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 13 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 56 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 20%
Environmental Science 2 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2023.
All research outputs
#22,759,802
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#653
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,707
of 90,165 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 90,165 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them