↓ Skip to main content

The story of critical care in Asia: a narrative review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Intensive Care, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
106 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The story of critical care in Asia: a narrative review
Published in
Journal of Intensive Care, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40560-021-00574-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason Phua, Chae-Man Lim, Mohammad Omar Faruq, Khalid Mahmood Khan Nafees, Bin Du, Charles D. Gomersall, Lowell Ling, Jigeeshu Vasishtha Divatia, Seyed Mohammad Reza Hashemian, Moritoki Egi, Aidos Konkayev, Mohd Basri Mat-Nor, Gentle Sunder Shrestha, Madiha Hashmi, Jose Emmanuel M. Palo, Yaseen M. Arabi, Hon Liang Tan, Rohan Dissanayake, Ming-Cheng Chan, Chairat Permpikul, Boonsong Patjanasoontorn, Do Ngoc Son, Masaji Nishimura, Younsuck Koh

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 106 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Researcher 6 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 5%
Other 5 5%
Student > Master 4 4%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 61 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Social Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 8%
Unknown 63 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 October 2021.
All research outputs
#18,145,205
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Intensive Care
#422
of 521 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#293,939
of 434,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Intensive Care
#13
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 521 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.