↓ Skip to main content

Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant dosing in atrial fibrillation patients is associated with prescriptions for outpatients rather than inpatients: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, February 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 150)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Inappropriate direct oral anticoagulant dosing in atrial fibrillation patients is associated with prescriptions for outpatients rather than inpatients: a single-center retrospective cohort study
Published in
Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences, February 2020
DOI 10.1186/s40780-020-0157-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Motoyasu Miyazaki, Koichi Matsuo, Masanobu Uchiyama, Yoshihiko Nakamura, Yuya Sakamoto, Momoko Misaki, Kaoko Tokura, Shiro Jimi, Keisuke Okamura, Sen Adachi, Tomohiko Yamamoto, Kazuyuki Shirai, Hidenori Urata, Osamu Imakyure

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Researcher 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 23 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 25 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2021.
All research outputs
#13,227,671
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
#46
of 150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#207,328
of 456,931 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences
#1
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 150 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,931 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them