You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Epidural analgesia and cesarean delivery in multiple sclerosis post-partum relapses: the Italian cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Neurology, December 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2377-12-165 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luisa Pastò, Emilio Portaccio, Angelo Ghezzi, Bahia Hakiki, Marta Giannini, Lorenzo Razzolini, Elisa Piscolla, Laura De Giglio, Carlo Pozzilli, Damiano Paolicelli, Maria Trojano, Maria Giovanna Marrosu, Francesco Patti, Loredana La Mantia, Gian Luigi Mancardi, Claudio Solaro, Rocco Totaro, Maria Rosaria Tola, Valeria Di Tommaso, Alessandra Lugaresi, Lucia Moiola, Vittorio Martinelli, Giancarlo Comi, Maria Pia Amato, and for the MS Study Group of the Italian Neurological Society |
| Abstract |
Few studies have systematically addressed the role of epidural analgesia and caesarean delivery in predicting the post-partum disease activity in women with Multiple Sclerosis (MS).The objective of this study was to assess the impact of epidural analgesia (EA) and caesarean delivery (CD) on the risk of post-partum relapses and disability in women with MS. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 40% |
| Egypt | 1 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 1 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Egypt | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 84 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 23% |
| Unknown | 22 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 53% |
| Neuroscience | 7 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2013.
All research outputs
#2,697,434
of 24,991,957 outputs
Outputs from BMC Neurology
#278
of 2,658 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,657
of 292,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Neurology
#5
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,991,957 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,658 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.