You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability, validity and acceptability of the traditional Chinese version of the carer support needs assessment tool in Hong Kong palliative care settings
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Palliative Care, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12904-021-00852-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hui-Lin Cheng, Doris Yin Ping Leung, Po Shan Ko, Ming Wai Chung, Wai Man Lam, Po Tin Lam, Andrew Leung Luk, Simon Ching Lam |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 21% |
| Researcher | 3 | 9% |
| Librarian | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 27% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,837,924
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from BMC Palliative Care
#495
of 1,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,854
of 434,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Palliative Care
#12
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,992 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.