You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Magnetically guided theranostics: montmorillonite-based iron/platinum nanoparticles for enhancing in situ MRI contrast and hepatocellular carcinoma treatment
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12951-021-01052-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ming-Hsien Chan, Chih-Ning Lu, Yi-Lung Chung, Yu-Chan Chang, Chien-Hsiu Li, Chi-Long Chen, Da-Hua Wei, Michael Hsiao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
| Researcher | 2 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Professor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 2 | 9% |
| Materials Science | 2 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 9% |
| Unknown | 13 | 59% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2021.
All research outputs
#14,220,289
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#479
of 1,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#200,649
of 435,923 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#29
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,531 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,923 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.