↓ Skip to main content

Zoonotic pathogens associated with Hyalomma aegyptium in endangered tortoises: evidence for host-switching behaviour in ticks?

Overview of attention for article published in Parasites & Vectors, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Zoonotic pathogens associated with Hyalomma aegyptium in endangered tortoises: evidence for host-switching behaviour in ticks?
Published in
Parasites & Vectors, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1756-3305-5-301
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anamaria I Paștiu, Ioana A Matei, Andrei D Mihalca, Gianluca D’Amico, Mirabela O Dumitrache, Zsuzsa Kalmár, Attila D Sándor, Menelaos Lefkaditis, Călin M Gherman, Vasile Cozma

Abstract

Hyalomma aegyptium is a hard-tick with a typical three-host life cycle. The main hosts are Palearctic tortoises of genus Testudo. However, other hosts can be used by immature ticks for feeding in natural conditions. Given this complex ecology and multiple host use, the circulation of pathogens by H. aegyptium between various hosts can be important from epidemiological point of view. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of H. aegyptium as natural carrier of four important zoonotic pathogens.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Romania 2 3%
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Serbia 1 1%
Unknown 65 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 26%
Researcher 10 14%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Professor 5 7%
Other 11 15%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 43%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 11 15%
Environmental Science 5 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2013.
All research outputs
#14,159,409
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Parasites & Vectors
#2,796
of 5,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,270
of 280,171 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Parasites & Vectors
#26
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,434 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,171 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.