↓ Skip to main content

Evaluating the responsiveness of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Group and individual level analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
195 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluating the responsiveness of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-Being Scale (WEMWBS): Group and individual level analysis
Published in
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, December 2012
DOI 10.1186/1477-7525-10-156
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hendramoorthy Maheswaran, Scott Weich, John Powell, Sarah Stewart-Brown

Abstract

Mental well-being now features prominently in UK and international health policy. However, progress has been hampered by lack of valid measures that are responsive to change. The objective of this study was to evaluate the responsiveness of the Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) at both the individual and group level.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
Unknown 301 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 14%
Researcher 40 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 12%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Lecturer 14 5%
Other 61 20%
Unknown 75 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 76 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 40 13%
Social Sciences 31 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 2%
Other 43 14%
Unknown 90 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 January 2013.
All research outputs
#7,896,290
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#910
of 2,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,208
of 288,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
#6
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,779 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.