You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tagmatization in Stomatopoda – reconsidering functional units of modern-day mantis shrimps (Verunipeltata, Hoplocarida) and implications for the interpretation of fossils
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Zoology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-9994-9-31 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Carolin Haug, Wafaa S Sallam, Andreas Maas, Dieter Waloszek, Verena Kutschera, Joachim T Haug |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| United States | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 16 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 5 | 25% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 15% |
| Professor | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 50% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 10% |
| Psychology | 1 | 5% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 10% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,148,094
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Zoology
#340
of 695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,556
of 192,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Zoology
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.