↓ Skip to main content

Avocado consumption is associated with better diet quality and nutrient intake, and lower metabolic syndrome risk in US adults: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES…

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#8 of 1,529)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
74 news outlets
blogs
10 blogs
twitter
191 X users
facebook
47 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
36 Google+ users
reddit
1 Redditor
video
12 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
370 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Avocado consumption is associated with better diet quality and nutrient intake, and lower metabolic syndrome risk in US adults: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001–2008
Published in
Nutrition Journal, January 2013
DOI 10.1186/1475-2891-12-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Victor L Fulgoni, Mark Dreher, Adrienne J Davenport

Abstract

Avocados contain monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) dietary fiber, essential nutrients and phytochemicals. However, no epidemiologic data exist on their effects on diet quality, weight management and other metabolic disease risk factors. The objective of this research was to investigate the relationships between avocado consumption and overall diet quality, energy and nutrient intakes, physiological indicators of health, and risk of metabolic syndrome.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 191 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 361 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 90 24%
Student > Master 67 18%
Other 21 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 5%
Other 56 15%
Unknown 96 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 5%
Engineering 12 3%
Other 54 15%
Unknown 116 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 825. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#22,842
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#8
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86
of 291,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.