You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Avocado consumption is associated with better diet quality and nutrient intake, and lower metabolic syndrome risk in US adults: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001–2008
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, January 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-1 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Victor L Fulgoni, Mark Dreher, Adrienne J Davenport |
Abstract |
Avocados contain monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA) dietary fiber, essential nutrients and phytochemicals. However, no epidemiologic data exist on their effects on diet quality, weight management and other metabolic disease risk factors. The objective of this research was to investigate the relationships between avocado consumption and overall diet quality, energy and nutrient intakes, physiological indicators of health, and risk of metabolic syndrome. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 191 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 39 | 20% |
Mexico | 17 | 9% |
Spain | 10 | 5% |
South Africa | 7 | 4% |
Pakistan | 6 | 3% |
United Kingdom | 6 | 3% |
Australia | 5 | 3% |
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 2% |
Canada | 3 | 2% |
Other | 24 | 13% |
Unknown | 70 | 37% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 144 | 75% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 17% |
Scientists | 10 | 5% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 370 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | <1% |
Colombia | 1 | <1% |
Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 361 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 90 | 24% |
Student > Master | 67 | 18% |
Other | 21 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 6% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 5% |
Other | 56 | 15% |
Unknown | 96 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 20% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 17% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 36 | 10% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 17 | 5% |
Engineering | 12 | 3% |
Other | 54 | 15% |
Unknown | 116 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 825. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2024.
All research outputs
#22,842
of 25,775,807 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#8
of 1,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86
of 291,038 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#1
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,775,807 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,529 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,038 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.