↓ Skip to main content

Predictive power of extubation failure diagnosed by cough strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
93 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Predictive power of extubation failure diagnosed by cough strength: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Critical Care, October 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13054-021-03781-5
Authors

Jun Duan, Xiaofang Zhang, Jianping Song

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 93 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 43%
Researcher 1 14%
Student > Postgraduate 1 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 71%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 14%
Unknown 1 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 65. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2021.
All research outputs
#460,903
of 19,913,701 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#337
of 5,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,462
of 346,072 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,913,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,072 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them