You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Obstetric neonatal emergency simulation workshops in remote and regional South India: a qualitative evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Advances in Simulation, October 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41077-021-00187-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bella Zhong, Mahbub Sarkar, Nandakumar Menon, Shylaja Devi, Jayaram K. Budanoor, Naresh Beerappa, Atul Malhotra, Arunaz Kumar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 4 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Brazil | 1 | 5% |
| South Africa | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 15 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 55% |
| Scientists | 4 | 18% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 45 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 6 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 9% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 20% |
| Unknown | 18 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 13% |
| Psychology | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,683,460
of 24,932,492 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Simulation
#122
of 262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,313
of 428,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Simulation
#7
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,932,492 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.